结构冲突:安全博弈中的一体化困境——以东北亚地区为例  

Structural Conflict:Security Gaming and Integration Dilemma——A case study of Northeast Asian Region

作　　者：王巍巍[1] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学马克思主义学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《延边大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第2期24-29,共6页Journal of Yanbian University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：黑龙江大学2013年度青年科学基金项目(QW20B05)

摘　　要：自第二次世界大战以来,欧盟区域一体化进程的示范效应为国际关系理论摆脱传统现实主义范式提供了一种新的研究路径。但是,新功能主义理论提出这一模式却无法在东北亚地区有效展开。结构现实主义的视角能够更好地解释欧盟一体化模式在东北亚地区遇到的理论与现实困境,即霸权国与崛起国的结构性矛盾是东北亚一体化的根本障碍。大国间对于相对收益甚于对绝对收益的关注、对政治安全甚于对经济福利的关注的叠加,使得该地区始终无法摆脱现实主义政治中安全困境的魔咒。东北亚现有的结构性矛盾显示,中国是东北亚崛起中的大国,美国防范中国在东北亚的影响,东北亚其他国家利用美国平衡中国的地区影响。中国必须承担更多的地区责任并致力于发展一种适合东北亚的合作模式,推动东北亚一体化的实现。The integration process of Europe has provided theory of international relations with a new route to free from the paradigm of traditional realism. However, this mode has not been successfullly implemented in Northeast Asia. Structural realism can better explain the implementation dilemma theorically and practically, i.e. the structural contradiction is the basic barrier of the integration of Northeast Asian. Powerful countries focus more on their absolute interests, political security and economic welfare, and this makes the region restricted by realistic political security. It is shown that China is now becoming more and more powerful, while the U. S. A has been trying to prevent China from its influence on this region, and other countries concerned take the advantage to balance China＇ influence. Therefore, China should undertake the responsibility and make efforts to develop a coorpera- tire mode so as to promote the realization of Northeast Asian integration.

关 键 词：东北亚一体化 结构现实主义 安全困境 

分 类 号：D73[政治法律—政治学] D80[政治法律—中外政治制度]