礼让说在美国冲突法中的继受和嬗变  

On the Acceptance and Modification of Comity in American Conflict of Laws

作　　者：赵学清[1] 郭高峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学国际法学院,重庆400031

出　　处：《河北法学》2014年第4期28-36,共9页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：礼让说作为一种国际私法学说,其最初的理论基础是国家主权利益之冲突。基于这一视角,梳理礼让说在美国冲突法理论界和判例法中的发展脉络,可以得出这样的结论:礼让说在美国理论界和判例法中大致都经历了一个从肯定、否定到否定之否定的历史循环之进程。但该循环并非简单机械的重复,当代美国理论界在把礼让的基础重新定位于国家主权利益之冲突之上的同时,关注重心从"为何适用外国法律"转向到"怎样选择法律"的层面之上。礼让说在美国的发展和嬗变对我国国际私法的重要启示意义在于:我国外国法的适用理论的构建应该建立在坚持国家主权独立和尊重他国国家主权的前提和基础之上,同时应注重提高法院的效率,便利国际贸易和促进国际关系的发展。As one of the doctrines in respect of private international law, the theory of Comity is originally grounded on the conflicts of sovereign interests. From this perspective, by combing the development of Comity in both theoretical field and case law domain in America, a conclusion could be drawn that, in the aforesaid fields, Comity in America has undergone a historical cycle of affirmation, negation and negation of negation. However, it is more than a simple and mechanic repetition. While American theoretical field resituates Comity in its historical ground of sovereign interest conflicts, the focus on Comity is changed from ＂ why foreign laws should be applicable＂ to ＂ how to choose laws＂. The development and modification of Comity in America can inspire China＇ s private international law as follows： the construction of theory for China＇ s foreign law application should be grounded on the premise of sovereign independence and deference to other sovereignties, meanwhile paying attention to efficiency of courts, for the purpose of facilitating international trade and promoting international rela- tions.

关 键 词：礼让说 美国冲突法 继受和嬗变 

分 类 号：D997[政治法律—国际法学]