检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]甘肃省张掖市甘州区疾病预防控制中心,甘肃张掖734000
出 处:《国外医学(医学地理分册)》2014年第1期27-29,共3页Foreign Medical Sciences:Section of Medgeography
摘 要:目的研究不同灭蟑方法对甘州区室内蟑螂的杀灭效果。方法在甘州区选择蟑螂危害较重的4栋居民楼,采用不同的灭蟑方法进行现场杀灭,并在灭前、灭后7 d、30 d用粘捕法测定蟑螂密度。结果滞留喷洒、胶饵、滞留喷洒和胶饵联合使用、1%毒力岛杀蟑饵剂的7 d杀灭率分别为72.07%、60.50%、82.34%、90.76%;灭后30 d杀灭率分别为66.67%、76.83%、91.49%和95.28%。结论采用联合用药和1%毒力岛杀蟑饵剂的杀灭率效果明显高于单一用药方式,且1%毒力岛杀蟑饵剂安全、高效,蟑螂不易产生抗药性,可作为甘州区室内灭蟑的首选药物。Objective To study the efficacy of ddifferent methods for killing cockroaches in Ganzhou District. Methods Four residential buildings with serious cockroaches infestation were selected. Different methods were used to kill cockroaches in site,and the cockroach density was determined by sticky trap method before the killing,7 days and 30 days after killing. Results The killing ratio of residual spraying, gel bait, residual spraying and gel bait used in combination, 1% Dulidao gel bait was 72.07 %, 60.50 %, 82.34 % and 90.760~ 7 days after killing~ and was 66.67% ,76.83%, 91. 49% and 95.28% 30 days after killing. Conclusion Residual spraying combined with gel bait, and 1% Dulidao gel bait were significantly more effective than the other two methods. And 1% Dulidao gel bait was safe and efficient, with less drug resistance, which can be the first choice to kill indoor cockroaches.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.50