PVA海绵通气管在鼻腔术后应用效果评价  

Application value of PVA sponge ventilation pipe in the nasal cavity after operation

作　　者：姚冬杰[1] 倪宏亮[1] 王姝[1] 

机构地区：[1]牡丹江医学院第二附属医院医务科,黑龙江省牡丹江157009

出　　处：《国外医学（医学地理分册）》2014年第1期47-49,共3页Foreign Medical Sciences：Section of Medgeography

基　　金：黑龙江省牡丹江市科技局科学研究项目(No.Z2013g010)

摘　　要：目的确定PVA海绵通气管在鼻腔术后应用价值。方法对2013年1月至2013年10月鼻内窥镜下鼻腔手术术后90例鼻腔填塞物对患者引发的鼻腔胀痛、头痛、口腔呼吸、睡眠情况、恐惧感等不良反应进行分析,通过3种鼻腔填塞物对比,采用术后鼻腔填塞物对患者的影响分值评定标准,统计、对比3种填塞物分值,评价PVA海绵通气管在鼻腔术后应用价值。结果通过对比统计分值可以看出PVA海绵通气管是油纱条术后鼻腔填塞痛苦及负面影响的54%,是3组中分值最小,能够确定PVA海绵通气管在减轻鼻腔填塞物对患者的损害,降低对患者的负面影响及痛苦感受上最具临床应用价值。结论PVA海绵通气管在鼻腔术后应用价值较其他鼻腔填塞物更具优势,值得临床推广。Objective nasal cavity after operation Objective To determine the application value of PVA sponge ventilation tube in the Methods Data of 90 cases of nasal packing treated with nasal endoscopic surgery during Jan. 2013 to Otc. 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Complications such as nasal pain, headache, mouth breathing, sleep, fear and discomfort caused by 3 types of nasal packing materials, including PVA sponge ventilation tube, PVA sponge piece, and vaseline gauze, were compared. Results According to the statistics, PVA sponge ventilation tube caused the fewest complications among the three nasal packing materials. Conclusion PVA sponge ventilation pipe has more advantages than other nasal packing materials after surgery, and is worth clinical promotion.

关 键 词：鼻腔填塞物 PVA海绵通气管 PVA海绵 油纱条 鼻内窥镜 

分 类 号：R762[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]