行政信访中申诉专员制度引进的商榷  

On Critical of Utilizing Ombudsman to Reform Administrative Letters and Visits System

作　　者：赵豪[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610207

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2014年第1期100-104,共5页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

摘　　要：行政信访改革成为近几年我国政治体制改革中的热门话题。目前大多数学者认为我国可以移植申诉专员制度改革行政信访,并提出了人大信访委员会模式。申诉专员制度拥有许多优点,但好的制度不代表是适宜的制度。在对其进行一番冷思考后,申诉专员制度与我国的政体和人民代表大会制度存在着诸多冲突。该制度的移植不仅在原则上不被允许,即使改造后引进,在现行制度结构下的改革效果也十分有限。分解行政信访功能,弱化直至废除纠纷解决功能,解决行政信访功能错位的现实问题,才是符合我国国情的行政信访改革路径。Administrative Letters and Visits Reform has become a hot topic in recent years of China＇s political reform. Most scholars think that Ombudsman can be transplanted in China to reform Administrative Letters and Visits and they propose the Letters and Visits Committee of National People＇s Congress, Ombudsman has many advantages, but good system does not mean appropriation. After some critical ponderings, there are many contracditons between Ombudsman and National People＇s Congress. Not only be allowed to transplant Ombudsman in principle, but also the effect of the reform is restricted under the existing political system. That decomposes Administrative Letters and Visits function, weakens still to abolish the dispute resolution function and solves the function dislocation of Administrative Letters and Visits are the true reform way, which is most suitable for China.

关 键 词：申诉专员制度 行政信访 人大信访委员会 

分 类 号：DF31[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]