检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山西大学政治与公共管理学院,太原030006
出 处:《科学技术哲学研究》2014年第2期91-95,共5页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"资源产权制度改革与资源型乡村治理研究"(10BZZ023);山西大学政治与公共管理学院资助项目"城镇化背景下的基层治理研究"
摘 要:我国科技与乡村变迁的关系大致经历了传统社会的相隔离、近代社会的相抵制、集体化时期的相适应以及改革开放后的相融合四个阶段。在这一过程中,科技发展不仅改变乡村治理方式,还会严重影响乡村治理的效果。同时,乡村治理方式如果不能与科技推广相适应,就会阻碍科技发展和乡村进步。因此,乡村建设既要加大"科技下乡"的投入力度,更要加强"科技惠民"的制度建设,寻求科技进步与乡村良好治理的共识。China has experienced four periods in the view of relationship between technology and rural development, which are the incompatible period in traditional society, the resistance period in the modern society, the adaptation period during collectivization and the integration period after reforming and opening up. The process shows that the development of technology is not only changing the rural governance mode, but also impacting its effect seriously. Nevertheless, if rural governance mode cannot integrate with the development of science, it is more than an obstacle to the development of rural area. Hence, in rural construction we should enhance technological investment and regu- lation construction, and finally seek consensus between science development and social regulations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15