气管切开术后两种吸痰方式的效果比较  

Comparison of Two Different Ways of Sputum Aspiration Effect after Tracheotomy

作　　者：周小梅[1] 雷玲[1] 谭瑛[1] 

机构地区：[1]自贡市第四人民医院,四川自贡643000

出　　处：《中外医学研究》2014年第9期82-84,共3页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH

摘　　要：目的:探讨两种吸痰方式对气管切开患者呼吸道的排痰效果。方法:将40例气管切开患者采用随机数字表法分成观察组和对照组,各20例。观察组采用封闭式吸痰管加人工鼻进行封闭式吸痰,对照组采用一次性吸痰管进行开放式吸痰,观察两组患者的排痰效果、排痰次数、排痰时间及脉搏氧饱和度的变化。结果:封闭式吸痰效果优于开放式吸痰,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:封闭式吸痰效果好、方法简单、节省人力,值得推广应用。Objective： To explore the effects of sputum elimination of two different ways of sputum aspiration for patients with tracheotomy in respiratory tract.Method： 40 eases of tracheotomy patients were randomly divided into two groups, the observation group used closed suction tube with artificial nose for closed endotracheal suction, the control group used disposable suction tube open sucking sputum, two groups were observed in patients with sputum elimination effect, the time and number of sputum elimination, and the change of pulse oxygen saturation.Result： Closed suction effect than that of open sucking sputum, the differences were statistically significant（P〈0.05）.Conclusion. Closed suction effect is good, the method is simple, and save manpower, it is worthy of popularization and application.

关 键 词：气管切开 吸痰方式 排痰 

分 类 号：R653[医药卫生—外科学]