防卫过当视域下的心理责任形态  

The Form of Psychological Responsibility in Excessive Defense

作　　者：黄凰[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2014年第1期18-23,94,共6页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：正当防卫作为法定的正当化事由,受到法律的鼓励和支持。防卫过当的主观心理状态是一个十分复杂的问题,也可以说是正当防卫理论中观点最混乱的一个问题。这个问题的解决对于司法实践具有十分重要的意义。学界对于防卫过当的罪过形式一直存在争议,而这又涉及犯罪论以及构成要件的要素符合规范性等相关知识。防卫意思在正当防卫以及防卫过当中的不可忽视的重要地位,故意与过失以及故意的不同层次对防卫过当的主观心理责任形式有不同的影响,需要重新梳理防卫过当的罪过形式,将直接故意排除出防卫过当的范畴,将防卫过当的主观心理责任形式限定为过失和间接故意。Justifiable defence, as one of the statutory reasons, is encouraged and supported by the law. But the form of psychological responsibility of excessive defense is a very complicated issue, or even the most disordered issue in self-defense. Its resolution means a lot to our judicial practice. There are lasting disputes over the crime of excessive defense among the scholars, which are also related to the criminal theory, the normativity of the constituents and other knowledge. This article, first of all, analyzes the importance of defense intention in self-defense and excessive defence, then investigates the form of psychological responsibility in excessive defense by refering to the academic division between the intent and negligence and between different levels of intent. Then it reviews the crime of excessive defense and excludes the direct intent. At last, it concludes that the form of psychological responsibility of excessive defense should be limited to negligence and the indirect intent.

关 键 词：正当防卫 防卫过当 防卫意思 罪过形式 直接故意 防卫目的 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]