检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海理工大学能源与动力工程学院,上海200093
出 处:《制冷学报》2014年第2期30-35,共6页Journal of Refrigeration
摘 要:全管束配水方式的特点是对每根工艺管单独配水。在喷淋量为0.5—1.2m。/h,迎面风速为0.5—4.0m/s下通过实验研究了喷淋水量和迎面风速对全管束配水蒸发式冷凝器管外流动阻力的影响,并与常规集中配水方式进行了对比。结果表明:在顺流及逆流状态下,喷淋量为1.2m3/h时,全管束配水蒸发式冷凝器管外空气流动阻力比集中配水蒸发式冷凝器,平均减少11.5%及49.7%。当逆流流动时,全管束配水空气流动阻力突增点的迎面风速为3.5m/s,高于集中配水蒸发式冷凝器。全管束配水蒸发式冷凝器与常规蒸发式冷凝器相比,应用于制冷系统中可节能2%左右。There are a lot of advantages when water is distributed on every tube respectively. The influences of the spray water flow rate and the air velocity on the air flow resistance of evaporative condenser with water distributed among the whole tube bundle structure were investigated, and conventional spraying water structure was compared with the new structure. The experiment was carried out on the condi- tion that the water flow rate was O. 5 - 1.2 m3/h and the air velocity was 0.5 - 4.0 m/s. The results show that the air flow resistance of this new structure decreases 11.5% at parallel-flow mode and 49.7% at counter-flow mode respectively. In addition, at counter-flow mode, the air flow resistance increases suddenly when the air velocity is 3.5 m/s, which is higher than that of traditional evaporative con- denser. Energy-saving is about 2% , comparing with the conventional spray water structure when used in refrigeration system.
分 类 号:TB657.5[一般工业技术—制冷工程] TB611
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28