检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《天津商业大学学报》2014年第2期62-67,共6页Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce
基 金:天津市2013年度哲学社会科学规划课题"国有股股东权之行使与监管关系研究"(TJFX13-010)中期成果
摘 要:国有公司高管职务经济犯罪案件屡屡发生,涉案数额巨大。由于国有公司国家股东身份的特殊性,法官在审判此类案件时,往往忽视国有公司的独立法律人格,将罪犯侵害公司的犯罪所得作为"追缴"、"没收"等刑事处罚措施的对象,损害了国有公司的利益。刑事审判的法官应当具备必要的商法思维能力,厘清罪犯占有财产的权利归属,应当返还公司,不应作为"追缴"或"没收"的对象。Economic work-related crime committed by senior executive in state-owned enterprise has been occurring time and again, which deals with a large amount of money. Due to the special nature of national shareholder' s identity of state-owned enterprise, at the trial of such cases, judges often ignore the independent legal personality of state-owned en- terprise and take illegal gains as the object of "retrieval", "confiscation" and other criminal penalties, which does harm to the interests of state-owned enterprise. Criminal judge should have necessary commercial thinking capacity and clarify the ownership of criminals' possessed property. The property, which ought to be returned, should not be taken as the object of "retrieval" or "confiscation".
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3