渔业中介组织相关概念辨析及政策建议  

Differentiating and analyzing the related concepts of fisheries intermediary organizations and policy suggestion

作　　者：孔凡宏[1,2] 张继平[1] 施锋 

机构地区：[1]上海海洋大学人文学院,上海201306 [2]复旦大学公共管理博士后流动站,上海200433 [3]江苏省南通市海洋与渔业局,江苏南通226018

出　　处：《上海海洋大学学报》2014年第2期265-271,共7页Journal of Shanghai Ocean University

基　　金：上海海洋大学人文社科项目(A-2502-12-0000-66)

摘　　要：渔业协会、渔业学会与渔业专业合作社都属于渔业中介组织,都依法成立与运作,并实行民主的管理方式,具有表征上的同一性。但通过性质、职能、登记管理机关三个维度的深入考察,又会发现三者存在显著的差异。三者表征上的相似性,产生了一定的问题,突出表现在渔业协会与渔业专业合作社在概念使用上出现乱象,在职能定位上出现错位、越位与缺位。与此同时,一些地方政府在扶持三类中介组织时也出现了扶持方式与力度拿捏不准的现象。三类中介组织亟需在概念界分、职能定位、扶持方式与力度上做进一步廓清,以保障其健康生存与有序发展的空间。Fisheries association, fisheries society, and fisheries cooperative, which are established and operated legally, and managed democratically, belong to fisheries intermediary organizations that have similar appearance. Through deep research from three dimensions of nature, function and registration authority, distinct differentiations can be found. Similar appearance leads to certain problems, which reflects critically on the concepts abuse and the dislocation, offside and lack of functions between fisheries society and fisheries cooperative. At the same time, a few of local governments cant master the way and strength of support among them correctly. In order to safeguard their healthy existence and orderly development space, they need further clarification in concept differentiation, function orientation, the way and strength of support carefully.

关 键 词：渔业协会 渔业学会 渔业专业合作社 概念辨析 政策建议 

分 类 号：C936[经济管理—管理学]