“应当参照”否议  

Rejecting “Should Consult” in Legislations

作　　者：谢晖[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410012

出　　处：《现代法学》2014年第2期54-66,共13页Modern Law Science

摘　　要："应当"的规范指向是弱强行性规范,而"参照"的规范属性是限制任意性规范。强行性规范不论强弱,都不应修饰、也不能修饰、更不能改变任意性规范的属性,因此,"应当"无法修饰并改变"参照"的规范属性。这样,把"应当"与"参照"搭配在一起,就在形式上是非理的,实践上也不可能是有力的。合乎逻辑的搭配结构应是或者"应当依照",或者"可以参照"。这一有关规范词的微观研究说明关注法律虚词中规范词(关键词或"法眼")及其运用的研究,是法学理论和法律实践的共同要求。The normative nature of ＂should＂ is weak compulsory norm, while the normative nature of ＂consult＂ is limiting random norm. Whether compulsory norm is strong or weak, th.is can＇ t modify and change the nature of random norm, so ＂should＂ can＇t modify and change the normative nature of ＂consult＂. In this way, we should not put ＂should＂ and ＂consult＂ together, which is unreasonable in the form and cannot be strong in practice. The collocation of the logical structure should be ＂shall be in accordance with＂, or ＂can refer to＂. These microscopic studies about code word that focus on legal function specification in word or ＂clear＂ （keywords） and its application study are common requirement of legal theory and legal practice.

关 键 词：应当 参照 规范词 弱强行性规范 限制任意规范 

分 类 号：DF03[政治法律—法学理论]