检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王庆亮[1] 杨郁野[2] 张桂云[1] 高晓伟[1]
机构地区:[1]唐山市南堡开发区医院外科,唐山063305 [2]唐山市工人医院神经外科,唐山063000
出 处:《中国医药导刊》2014年第1期15-16,18,共3页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
摘 要:目的:通过研究传统开颅手术和不同新兴手术方法的疗效,探讨传统手术方法面临的诸多挑战。方法:对比分析传统手术和基于小骨窗的改良手术在治疗高血压脑出血疗效差别和术后评分,挖掘传统手术方法在治疗该疾病上的缺陷。结果:传统开颅手术和小骨窗开颅手术治疗后患者在脑神经功能缺损恢复程度、再出血情况等面临着严峻的考验。结论:传统手术治疗高血压脑出血的优势逐渐减弱,在改善高血压脑出血患者的神经功能、提高手术疗效和降低再出血率上需要提出更高的要求。Objective:By studying traditional craniotomy and the efficacy of the different emerging surgical methods,to explore the many challenges faced in traditional surgical methods.Methods:To analysis the differences between the traditional surgery and improved surgical treatment based on the small bone window of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, mining the defects of traditional surgical methods in the treatment of the disease.Results:Patients that after the traditional craniotomy and small bone window craniotomy facing severe tests in the recovery of neurological defects and in the rebleeding situation. Conclusion:The advantages that traditional craniotomy and small bone window craniotomy in the surgical treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage have been weakened,and higher requirements should be proposed to improve the neurological function of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage and the surgical efficacy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28