检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医药导刊》2014年第2期329-330,共2页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
摘 要:目的:探讨胆道镜配合取石钳在胆总管探查取石的临床效果,并与传统开腹取石的临床效果比较研究。方法:通过比对48例以往开腹取石的临床资料,分析胆道镜配合取石钳在胆总管探查取石手术(微创)方式的优势。结果:通过比对开腹手术过程中的失血量、术后器官恢复时间、术后住院时间等数据,发现两者的差异具有统计学意义。结论:与传统的开腹方式相比较,胆道镜配合取石钳在胆总管探查取石的微创手术具有术后住院时间短、术中出血少、器官功能恢复迅速等特点。Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of choledochoscopy combined with lithotomy forceps in common bile duct exploration,comparative study on clinical effect and stone and traditional laparotomy.Methods:by comparing 48 cases clinical data of previous open stone,with analysis of choledochoscopic lithotomy forceps operation in the exploration of common bile duct (minimally invasive) the advantage.Results:Compared to laparotomy operation process of blood loss,postoperative organ recovery time,postoperative hospitalization time data,find the difference has statistical significance.Conclusion:Compared with traditional open methods,choledochoscope combined with minimally invasive operation in lithotomy forceps for common bile duct stones with postoperative hospitalization time is short,less bleeding,rapid recovery of organ function etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200