非物质文化遗产私权主体保护范围之界定  

Jurisprudence Analysis on the Protection of the Intangible Cultural Heritage from Private Right

作　　者：李俊刚[1] 尚淑敏[1] 王荣华[1] 

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨理工大学法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040

出　　处：《黑河学院学报》2013年第6期26-29,共4页Journal of Heihe University

基　　金：黑龙江省哲学社会科学规划项目<黑龙江省非物质文化遗产的法律保护>(10B041)

摘　　要：在私法的保护体系中,知识产权法扮演了十分重要的角色,但知识产权法无法解决非物质文化遗产的所有问题。非物质文化遗产的私权主体是社区、群体和个人,作为传承者,该群体享有物质性和精神性利益,但由于权利主体身份的模糊性,该项权利在大工业化生产中被滥用,催生大量的"搭便车"现象。对于非物质文化遗产主体的保护模式不宜设定为一种个人专用的权利,应当是把它当做一种群体权利,以共同所有人的形式予以合理使用。当然,对于不具备群体性特征的非物质文化遗产,可以保持现状,以保证非物质文化遗产的自然传承。The implementation of Intangible cultural heritage law makes China＇s intangible cultural herit- age protection into a new stage. important to protect intangible c It is a milepost for the intangible cultural heritage protection work. And it is uhural heritage by the Public law, but the protection of private rights can pro- mote intangible cultural heritage to further development by folk force from perspective of cultural transmis- sion and inheritance. The intellectual property system act as a important role in the protection of private rights, but the intellectual property rights can not solve many problems of the intangible cultural heritage. The subject of the right of the intangible cultural heritage is a community, group and individual. As the inheritors, they have the material and spiritual interests, but due to the fuzzy subject identity, trialization production, create a lot of ＂hitchhike＂ the abuse of rights in the indus- phenomenon. It is not apt to choose a individual exclusive mode to protect intangible cultural heritage, should be set a group right, to intelligent use together.

关 键 词：非物质文化遗产 知识产权 私权保护 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]