检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚宏伟[1]
机构地区:[1]商丘市第一人民医院神经外科,河南省商丘476100
出 处:《中国基层医药》2014年第6期866-867,共2页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
摘 要:目的 探讨强化胰岛素治疗对重型颅脑外伤患者预后的影响.方法 将130例重型颅脑外伤患者按数字表法随机分为观察组65例和对照组65例,分别接受强化胰岛素治疗和传统的胰岛素治疗,观察两组感染率、住院时间、病死率及随访6个月的总体病死率等指标.结果 观察组感染率(32.4%)明显低于对照组(46.7%)(x2=1.946,P<0.05),观察组的住院时间[(23.7±2.4)d]明显短于对照组[(36.3±2.9)d](t =9.247,P<0.05);观察组院内病死率、随访6个月的总体病死率分别为27.6%、56.8%,对照组分别为26.8%、55.2%,两组差异均无统计学意义(x2=0.086、0.484,均P>0.05);随访6个月,观察组格拉斯哥评分4~5分(37.2%)明显高于对照组(19.8%)(x2=6.407,P<0.05).结论 强化胰岛素治疗能有效改善重型颅脑外伤患者预后.Objective To investigate the effects of intensive insulin therapy on prognosis of patients with se- vere traumatic brain injury. Methods 130 patients with severe traumatic brain injury ( GCS score 3-8) were randomly divided into the observation group (65 cases) and the control group (65 cases). The observation group received in- tensive insulin therapy, while the control group received conventional insulin therapy. The infection rate, hospital stay, in-hospital mortality and the 6-month mortality were observed. Results The infection rate of the observation group (32.4%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (46.7%) (~2 = 1. 946, P 〈 0.05 ). The hospi- tal stay of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group( t = 9. 247 ,P 〈 0.05). The in- hospital mortality and the 6-month mortality were similar in the two groups ( X2 = 0. 086,0. 484, all P 〉 0.05 ). The neurologic outcome according to Glasgow Outcome Score( GOS 4-5) at 6 months in the observation group was better than that in the control group ( X2 = 6. 407,P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Intensive insulin therapy can improve the prog- nosis of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30