检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]军事医学科学院疾病预防控制所,北京100071
出 处:《中国消毒学杂志》2014年第3期224-226,共3页Chinese Journal of Disinfection
基 金:北京市科技新星计划资助项目(Z131102000413069);军事医学科学院创新基金项目资助(2012CXJJ035)
摘 要:目的比较两种不同标准方法对压力蒸汽灭菌指示胶带的指示效果的影响。方法选择进口和国产压力蒸汽灭菌化学指示胶带产品,分别使用国际标准和中国标准的鉴定方法对其指示效果进行研究。结果进口产品采用ISO11140-1 2005的方法鉴定合格,采用中国2002年版《消毒技术规范》的方法鉴定不合格,国产产品采用两种标准的方法鉴定都合格。结论中国2002年版《消毒技术规范》关于压力蒸汽灭菌指示胶带的鉴定方法要比ISO11140-1 2005的要求更严格,更能保证指示经过灭菌处理的可靠性。Objective To compare the influences of two different standard methods on the indicating effect of pressure steam sterilization chemical indicator adhesive tape. Methods The imported and domestic pressure steam sterilization chemical indicator adhesive tapes were respectively selected and their indicating effects were studied with the identification methods using international standards and Chinese standards. Results The imported products were identified to be quali- fied using the method of ISO11140 -1 2005, but they were unqualified identified using the methods on Chinese "Technical standards for disinfection", edition 2002. The domestic products were all identified to be qualified using the two methods. Conclusion The identification method for the pressure steam sterilization chemical indicator adhesive tape on Chinese " Technical standard for disinfection" is stricter than ISO11140 -1, 2005, which can guarantee the reliability of the indica- tion after sterilization.
关 键 词:压力蒸气化学指示胶带 鉴定方法 国际标准方法 消毒技术规范
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.206