检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晨[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学国际关系学院,讲师。100872
出 处:《国际政治研究》2014年第1期104-124,7-8,共21页The Journal of International Studies
基 金:北京大学国际战略研究中心(现为北京大学国际战略研究院)2012-2013年度课题"利比亚战争中美国与欧洲军事力量的运用"
摘 要:2011年美国与英国、法国等欧洲国家动用军事力量干涉利比亚内战。在战略层面,利比亚战争显示出在金融危机的背景下,美欧发达国家依然具有军事优势,其军事战略也保持外向性,倾向于运用军事力量塑造全球和地区格局。在战役层面,利比亚战争不仅体现出西方军事同盟的灵活反应和适应能力,而且在作战过程中,美国及其主要盟友实现了前所未用的分工。在联合作战层面,美欧参战国家的海空力量实现进一步的整合。美欧均势力量对利比亚战争的干涉为中国的中东地区政策、亚太战略和国防建设提供了启示。In 2011,the US and some European countries such as the UK and France used military forces to intervene in the Libyan civil war. On the strategic level,the Libyan campaign demonstrated that in spite of the financial crisis,developed countries in North America and Europe still enjoyed military superiority,and their military strategy remained outward looking. Thus these countries were prepared to use military power to shape global and regional affairs. On the operational level,the Libyan campaign witnessed not only the Western alliance's flexible responses and adaptation ability,but also unprecedented division of labor between the U. S. and its major allies. In terms of joint operations,the U. S. and European naval and air forces achieved further integration during the Libyan campaign. The Libyan campaign has offered a few lessons for China in terms of its Middle East policy,Asia-Pacific strategy,as well as military modernization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117