腔内超声与经腹超声诊断输尿管中下段结石的对比分析  

ENDOSONOGRAPHY AND TRANSABDOMINAL ULTRASOUND FOR DIAGNOSIS OF MIDDLE OR LOWER URETEROLITH

作　　者：姜菊[1] 高纪称 周春艳[1] 郑辉[1] 由秀 杨亚峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北省廊坊市中医医院超声科,河北廊坊065000

出　　处：《河北医科大学学报》2014年第3期294-296,共3页Journal of Hebei Medical University

摘　　要：目的评价腔内超声和经腹超声对输尿管中下段结石的检出率及各自的优缺点。方法选择临床高度怀疑为输尿管结石的患者,先行经腹超声检查,排除输尿管上段结石后,采取经直肠(或阴道)超声检查,并对2种检查结果进行比较。结果112例输尿管中下段结石6例经腔内超声未检出,检出率为94.6%;38例经腹超声未检查出结石,检出率为66.0%。结论腔内超声对输尿管中下段结石的检出率显著高于经腹超声。Objective To compare the detection rate of endosonography and transabdominal ultrasonography in diagnosis of middle or lower ureterolith and evaluate their respective advantages and disadvantages.Methods Patients who were highly suspected with ureterolith were examined by transabdominal ultrasound firstly.When upper ureterolith was excluded,the patients were examined by transrectal ultrasound （or transvaginal）.Then,the results of the two kinds of inspections were compared.Results Six of 112 cases of middle or lower ureterolith were not detectable by endosonography,the detection rate was 94.6%,while 38 cases were not detectable by transabdominal ultrasound,the detection rate was 66.0%.Conclusion The detection rate of middle or lower ureterolith of endosonography is significantly higher than that of transabdominal ultrasound.

关 键 词：尿路结石 超声检查 多普勒 腔内超声检查 

分 类 号：R691.4[医药卫生—泌尿科学]