中国学生学者学术论文引言的短语学分析  

Phraseological Analysis of Chinese L1 Novice Writers' RA Introduction

作　　者：房印杰[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]北京邮电大学人文学院,北京100876 [2]北京外国语大学中国外语教育研究中心,北京100089

出　　处：《北京邮电大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第1期99-106,共8页Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：北京邮电大学青年科研创新计划专项项目(2013RC0704)

摘　　要：以通信工程类学术论文的引言为切入点,参照"建立学术研究空间"模型,通过学习者学术论文引言语料库(CUPT)与专家学术论文引言语料库(Telecom)开展短语学层面的对比分析,探究中国学生学者在学术论文引言中语言的使用特征与不足。研究表明,学习者学术论文引言语料库与专家学术论文引言语料库在三个语步上均存在一定程度的差异,其中,在第一语步层面,参照语料库表现出更加侧重学科术语;在第二语步上,参照引言语料库综合运用否定性词语与转折连词,如however;在第三语步上,虽然两个语料库均使用paper和section的相关短语序列,但是参照语料库的相关短语序列有着更高的多样性和频率。这说明,中国学生学者对于语步理论在学术论文中的体现还缺乏深入的理解。With the ever-increasing demand for academic English, a variety of studies have been carried out with regard to NNS＇ command of academic English. This study concerns the differences of academic English in RA introductions by novice and expert writers. Swales＇ CARS model, A top-down approach, has been utilized to stratify the novice writers＇ RA introduction corpus, called CUPT, and the expert writers＇ RA introduction corpus, called TELECOM into 3 sections. Then, in a bottom-up way, the two corpora are compared with respect to their wordlist, n-gram and phraseological frame. As can be seen, CUFF displays an evident difference from TELECOM. Technical jargons are favored by TELECOM in move 1 analysis, with the combined usage of adver- sative conjunctions and negative nouns by TELECOM in move ：2 comparison. Interestingly, both corpora exhibit a salient distribution of paper and section related n-grams, however, TELECOM possesses a much higher variety and frequency of those n-grams. On the basis of the above analyses, it seems that Chinese novice writers have not fully grasped the clusters that correspond to the moves in CARS model though they have kind of perceived the ubiquity of moves in RA introduction.

关 键 词：短语学 引言 短语型式 语步 论文写作 

分 类 号：H315[语言文字—英语] H152