检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学上海地面交通工具中心,上海201804
出 处:《风机技术》2014年第1期24-30,共7页Chinese Journal of Turbomachinery
摘 要:基于MRF定常计算和SM非定常计算方法,对某轴流式风机进行了设计工况下的数值模拟。讨论了不同计算方法边界条件设置和收敛性判定的区别,分析了计算方法对风机全压效率的影响,研究了风机内部流场动静交界面上的静压分布、50%叶高截面静压和速度分布、叶片表面压力分布和叶轮出口动压分布等参数。数值结果表明,定常计算结果和非定常计算结果具有相同的变化趋势,但是存在一定的差异,这主要是由于定常计算没有考虑风机内部流动的非定常效应造成的;非定常计算能够更好地模拟动静交界区域的流动,比采用定常计算具有更好的数值结果。An axial-flow fan was simulated on design-condition by CFD software based on MRF steady modeling and Sliding Mesh unsteady modeling. The difference of boundary conditions and convergence determination were discussed. The effect of different simulation methods on the efficiency performance of the axial-flow fan and several parameters, such as static pressure distribution at dynamic and static interface, static pressure and velocity distribution of 50% blade section, blade surface pressure distribution and impeller outlet dynamic pressure distribution, internal flow were also discussed. The results show that the steady simulation has the same trend with unsteady simulation, but it has a little difference. It mainly due to the steady calculation does not consider the unsteady effect of internal flow of fan. The unsteady calculation can simulate the flow at dynamic and static interface and has better effects than steady simulation.
分 类 号:TH432.1[机械工程—机械制造及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145