机构地区:[1]济宁医学院附属湖西医院ICU(原山东省单县中心医院ICU),274300
出 处:《中国医师进修杂志》2014年第8期11-14,共4页Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
基 金:山东省单县科研基金(SD-SXKYJZ-2012-01-01)
摘 要:目的 探讨上腔静脉-颈内静脉血氧饱和度差值(ScVO2-SjVO2)与重型颅脑损伤患者脑损伤程度和预后的关系及其临床价值.方法 选择重型颅脑损伤患者43例,按照入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分分为GCS评分3~5分组19例;GCS评分6~8分组24例;选取同期非颅脑损伤,意识清醒的患者20例作为对照组.观察各组患者入ICU后0,12,24,48 h时ScVO2-SjVO2的变化.并根据患者入ICU时ScVO2-SjVO2大小,分为ScVO2-SjVO2< 0.05组12例;ScVO2-SjVO20.05 ~0.15组14例;ScVO2-SjVO2> 0.15组17例,观察各组间患者GCS评分及28 d时病死率情况.结果 GCS评分3~5分组入ICU后0,12,24,48 h时ScVO2-SjVO2均较对照组明显减小(-0.071±0.032比0.093±0.049,-0.097±0.052比0.081±0.052,-0.035±0.031比0.089±0.059,0.036±0.033比0.081±0.064),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);GCS评分6~8分组入ICU后0,12,24h时ScVO2-SjVO2分别为0.173±0.043,0.158±0.067,0.123±0.073,均较对照组明显升高,差异有统计学意义(P< 0.01或<0.05).ScVO2-SjVO2< 0.05组及ScVO2-SjVO2> 0.15组病死率均较ScVO2-SjVO2 0.05~0.15组明显增加(8/12,4/17比1/14),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).ScVO2-SjVO2< 0.05组和ScVO2-SjVO2> 0.15组GCS评分均低于ScVO2-SjVO2 0.05 ~ 0.15组[(4.17±1.34)、(5.88±1.35)分比(6.86±1.35)分],差异有统计学意义(P< 0.01或<0.05).结论 ScVO2-SjVO2< 0.05时,差值大小与脑损伤程度呈负相关;ScVO2-SjVO2>0.15时,差值大小与脑损伤程度呈正相关.ScVO2-SjVO2可反映患者的脑氧代谢情况,能客观及时地评估脑损伤程度,为重型颅脑损伤的治疗提供循证依据,同时能早期预测患者的预后.Objective To explore the relationship between superior vena cava-jugular vein oxygen saturation-differential value (ScVO2-SjVO2) and injury severity and prognosis in patients suffered from severe traumatic brain injury,finding out the chnical value.Methods Forty-three patients with severe tranmatic brain injury were selected and divided into two groups according to Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score,19 cases were enrolled in GCS 3-5 scores group;24 cases in GCS 6-8 scores group;20 contemporaneous cases in control group had conscious and without traumatic brain injury.The changes of ScVO2-SjVO2 at 0,12,24,48 h after admission of ICU among the groups were observed.In addition according to the degree of change in ScVO2-SjVO2,12 cases were enrolled in ScVO2-SjVO2 < 0.05 group;14 cases in ScVO2-SjVO2 0.05-0.15 group; 17 cases in ScVO2-SjVO2 > 0.15 group.The GCS score and mortality rate in patients after brain injury 28 d among groups were observed.Results GCS 3-5 scores group compared with control group,ScVO2-SjVO2 reduced significantly at 0,12,24,48 h after admission of ICU (-0.071 ±0.032 vs.0.093 ±0.049,-0.097 ±0.052 vs.0.081 ±0.052,-0.035 ±0.031 vs.0.089 ± 0.059,0.036 ± 0.033 vs.0.081 ± 0.064),there were significant differences (P < 0.01).GCS 6-8 scores group compared with control group,ScVO2-SjVO2 dramatically increased at 0,12,24 h after admission of ICU(0.173 ± 0.043,0.158 ± 0.067,0.123 ± 0.073),there were significant differences (P < 0.01 or < 0.05).ScVO2-SjVO2 <0.05 group and ScVO2-SjVO2 >0.15 group compared with ScVO2-SjVO2 0.05-0.15group,the mortality rate significantly increased,the mortality rate were 8/12,4/17,1/14,respectively,there were significant differences (P <0.01).ScVO2-SjVO2 <0.05 group and ScVO2-SjVO2 >0.15 group compared with ScVO2-SjVO2 0.05-0.15 group,GCS score decreased significantly[(4.17 ± 1.34),(5.88 ±1.35) scores vs.(6.86 ± 1.35) scores],and there was significant difference (P <0.01 or <0.05).Conclusions When S
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...