检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]郑州大学第一附属医院感染科,河南郑州450052
出 处:《河南医学研究》2014年第2期25-27,共3页Henan Medical Research
摘 要:目的:探讨慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者应用普通干扰素(IFN)诱导HBV基因突变后的再次抗病毒疗效。方法:选择44例持续接受IFN治疗无效者检测出HBV-C区[C基因启动子(CP)/前C/C基因]突变的CHB患者,根据其再次抗病毒治疗药物的选择,分为聚乙二醇干扰素(PEG-IFN)组(A组)和拉米夫定组(B组),分析治疗6个月后HBV-DNA及ALT的变化。结果:抗病毒治疗6个月后,A组的ALT复常率及HBV-DNA阴转率分别为31.25%和37.50%,B组分别为75.00%和82.14%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:IFN诱导HBV-C区基因突变后,拉米夫定较PEG-IFN抗病毒疗效好。Objective : To explore the efficacy of the second antiviral treatment after common inter- feron-induced HBV gene mutation. Methods: 44 patients with HBV-C region [ core promoter (CP) and the precore/core gene] mutations after common interferon treatment were collected. Then they were divided into group A (treated by pegylated interferon) and group B (treated by lamivudine) according to different anti-virus drugs. The changes of the levels of HBV-DNA and ALT in two groups were analyzed after 6 months' treatment. Results: The rates of ALT normaliza- tion and HBV-DNA negative-converting were 75. 00% , 82. 14% in group A and 31. 25% , 37.50% in group B, the differences were of statistical significance antiviral efficacy of Lamivudine is better than pegylated interferon duced HBV-C area gene mutation. P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion : The n patients with interferon-in-
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.42.14