检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610207 [2]中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心,北京100872
出 处:《烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第2期24-34,共11页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基 金:黑龙江大学中俄人文合作协同创新中心重大攻关项目"中俄侵权法比较研究"(2012ZD007);国家社科基金青年项目"我国侵权法上公平责任适用研究"(11CFX037)
摘 要:我国民法上的发现权制度源于前苏联的科技成果权中的发现权制度,《民法通则》将其纳入知识产权体系是立法错位的遗留问题。发现权在性质上不是知识产权,我国司法实务对发现权的定性实为科学领域的荣誉权。建议以《人格权法》起草为契机,将发现权改造为一种科学领域的荣誉权,纳入人格权体系,对发现的判断标准、发现人的确认、发现权的内容和适用范围作出明确规定。The rule of discovery right in civil law of China has its origin in the rule of discovery right in the right of scientific and technological achievement system established by the former Soviet Union .It is an unsolved mistake of legislation that the General Principles of Civil Law treats it as an intellectual prop -erty right.Discovery right is not an intellectual property right in nature .The legal practice in China re-gards discovery right as the right of honor in the field of science .It is suggested that the drafting work of Personality Right Law provide an opportunity to transform the discovery right into the right of honor in the field of science , and consolidate it into the system of personality right , and provide a clear regulation in terms of criteria of judging a discovery , determining the discoverer , and the contents and scope of appli-cation of discovery right .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147