检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海市人民检察院第一分院二审处 [2]上海市人民检察院第一分院研究室
出 处:《海关与经贸研究》2014年第1期100-106,共7页Journal of Customs and Trade
摘 要:走私普通货物犯罪案件中因侦查取证的特殊性导致实践中自首的表现方式多种多样,司法机关对自首的认定存在一定分歧。通过对司法实践样本的类型化归纳,进一步提炼各类自首的具体认定标准,根据各类自首投案的主动性与自愿性在量刑上作出区分。同时,充分考虑其他量刑情节、《刑法修正案(八)》对走私普通货物罪法定刑数额标准调整的影响,进而探讨实现走私普通货物犯罪自首认定和量刑规范化的有效途径。The special characteristics of the investigation into the crime of smuggling common goods have led to various ways of surrender in the judicial practice and thedivergences in the decision on surrender among the judicial departments. By categorizing the practical samples of surrender, this article attempts to further refine the criteria of deter mining different types of surrender, and make a distinction in sentencing according to the ini- tiative and voluntariness of surrender. Meanwhile, this article takes into account the other sentencing circumstances and the influence of the adjustment of the amount standard of the statutory sentence made by the "The Criminal Law Amendment (Eight) " and probes into the effective ways of determining the surrender and realizing the standardization of conviction in the crime of smuggling common goods.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28