论劳教替代措施中的不法类型界分问题  

Definition of Lawless Types in Alternative Labor Education Measures

作　　者：贾健[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《安徽师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第2期220-224,共5页Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(12CFX003)

摘　　要：劳教制度废除之后,对原本由其规制的行为进行分流是当下劳教改革的必由之路。由此,某一劳教类型应该以何标准来决定其究竟是分流至《治安管理处罚法》还是《刑法》,成为劳教改革所无法回避的问题。在当前法益理论日益呈现自由主义趋向的情况下,刑法作为保护法益最为得力的部门法,理应侧重于对个体法益的保护,而治安管理处罚法由于其命令做出之普遍性的行政逻辑,因而更适合用于保护超个体法益。以此为标准,可以确定劳教改革的不法类型界分标准,并对几种典型的劳教类型进行具体分流。After labor education is abolished, it is necessary to divert the hehaviors regulated by labor education. It is an inevitable problem that a type of labor education should be judged by a certain type of criteria to Security Administration Punishment Law or Criminal law. At present, legal interest theory is increasingly showing liberal trend. Criminal Law, as the most effective branch of law to protect legal interests, should be focused on the individual legal interest protection, while Security Administration Punishment Law, due to its command to make the universality of the administrative logic, is more suitable for the protection of individual legal interests. This criterion is utilized to determine the lawless types in labor education reform and divert the specific types of labor education.

关 键 词：劳教替代措施 不法类型界分 法益原则 具体分流措施 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]