检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国地质大学应用地球物理系,湖北武汉430074 [2]中原勘探开发科学研究院,河南濮阳457001
出 处:《物探与化探》2001年第1期61-65,69,共6页Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration
摘 要:通过对典型低速带起伏理论地质模型的常规静校正误差的计算和分析 ,表明在低速带起伏条件下用常规静校正方法进行低速带静校正存在较大的校正误差 ,不仅在时间剖面上产生假的同相轴特征现象 ,而且在反演速度上引起不真实的纵、横向速度变化 ;证明了低速带静校正误差主要与炮检距、目标层埋深。Based on calculation and analysis of conventional static correction error in the theoretical model for typical low velocity zone rolling terrain, this paper points out that adopting the conventional static correction method to proceed low velocity zone static correction under the condition of low velocity zone rolling terrain would lead to rather prominent correction error, which is expressed not only in generating spurious phase axis feature phenomenon, but also in causing wrong longitudinal and latitudinal velocity change in reversion velocity. It is also demonstrated in this paper that the low velocity zone static correction error is mainly related to such factors as the shot detector separation, the depth of target strarum, the curvature and form of the bottom boundary and the velocity difference between the low velocity zone and the bodrock.
关 键 词:起伏低速带 常规静校正 理论地质模型 误差分析 地震勘探
分 类 号:P631.4[天文地球—地质矿产勘探]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117