检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何康[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南大学金融与统计学院,湖南长沙410079
出 处:《中国科技论坛》2014年第4期62-67,共6页Forum on Science and Technology in China
基 金:中央高校青年教师项目(11HDSK055)
摘 要:本文基于2001—2010年中国36个工业行业的面板数据,采用考虑非期望产出的Malmquist指数对工业碳排放绩效进行测算,然后运用GLS法和面板门限回归就环境规制强度对异质性行业碳排放绩效的影响及门限效应进行实证检验。研究结果表明:环境规制力度的加大有利于提高全部行业的全要素碳排放绩效,"波特假说"在行业检验中成立,但环境规制强度对工业碳排放绩效的影响存在明显的行业异质性和非线性的门限效应。Based on the 2001--2010 panel data of China's 36 industries, this paper uses the Malmquist index considering the undesira- ble outputs to measure the industrial performance of carbon emission. Besides, it uses the GLS method and the panel threshold regres- sion to make an empirical test on the impact of environmental regulation intensity on carbon emissions performance of heterogeneity in- dustry and threshold effect. The results show that environmental regulation intensity is conducive to improve the whole industry total fac- tor of carbon emission performance. "Porter hypothesis" is established in industry test, but the impact of environmental regulation in- tensity on the industrial performance of carbon emission has obvious industry heterogeneity. Besides, there exists nonlinear threshold effect in the impact of environmental regulation intensity on industrial carbon emissions performance.
分 类 号:F062.1[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145