冲突性网评中情感立场的语用分析  

A pragmatic analysis of emotional stance in online conflict commentaries

作　　者：龚双萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]国防科技大学

出　　处：《现代外语》2014年第2期168-178,291,共11页Modern Foreign Languages

基　　金：广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划项目"话语和谐-不和谐取向的社交语用研究"(GD12CWW08);湖南省哲学社会科学基金课题"言语交际中身份与(不)礼貌的语用研究"(11YBA035)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：本文以钓鱼岛事件新闻报道中的冲突性网评为语料,结合Langlotz&Locher(2012)的冲突话语与情感立场理论和Spencer-Oatey(2008)的人际和谐管理模式提出了冲突性网评情感立场的语用解释框架,并在此框架下分析了冲突性网评中的情感立场。分析表明,冲突性网评中主要存在直接情感立场表达、间接情感立场隐含和情感描述等三类情感立场表达策略。冲突性网评所表达的概念内容、人/群际关系,以及情感立场是一个统一的意义整体,三者间存在着动态变化的相互关系。This paper probes into the emotional stances indexed by online conflict commentaries from a pragmatic perspective,drawing on the data from the archives of online news reports on the China-Japan dispute on Diaoyu islands. Based on Langlotz & Locher's(2012) theory of conflict discourse and emotional stance and Spencer-Oatey 's(2008) interpersonal rapport management model,an explanatory framework is proposed to analyze the emotional stances in the data. The study reveals three types of emotional stance strategies,viz. direct expression of emotional stances,implied indexing of emotional stances,and description of emotion. The pragmatic analysis further shows that the conceptual content,the interpersonal/intergroup relationship and the emotional stance expressed by the online conflict commentaries are closely related and they interact with one another in a dynamic and complex fashion.

关 键 词：冲突性网评 情感立场 表达策略 交际参与模式 人 群际关系管理 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]