检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2014年第8期1042-1045,共4页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
基 金:汕头市重点科技计划项目(汕府科[2011]46号-12)
摘 要:目的研究腹腔镜胆总管探查(LCBDE)术后胆总管一期缝合的安全胜及临床应用价值。方法分析140例腹腔镜胆总管切开探查取石术的临床资料,对比研究胆总管一期缝合(实验组,n=70)与T管引流(对照组,n=70)的临床效果。结果两组手术时间、腹腔引流时间、肝功能恢复、黄疸消退、术后胆瘘、残石率、结石复发等情况差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);实验组术后肛门排气时间、住院时间较对照组短(P〈0.05)。结论只要掌握适应证,LCBDE术后胆总管一期缝合是安全可行的,更避免了留置T管的弊端,值得推广应用。Objective To investigate the safety and elinical value of primary closure after laparoseopic common bile duct exploration ( LCBDE ) . Methods The clinical data of 140 patients undergoing laparoscopic common bile duct exploration were analyzed. 70 cases were primarily closed the common bile ducts ( experimental group ) , while the other 70 cases had T-tube drainage of common bile duct ( control group ) . Results There were no statistical differences in operation time, abdominal drainage time, recovery of liver function, decline of serum bilirubin, postoperative bile leakage, retained bile duct stones, bile duct recurrent stones between the two groups (P 〉 0.05 ) . Postoperative hospital stay and anal exhaustion time were shorter in the experimental group than in the control group (P 〈 0.05 ) . Conclusions If only the indication is properly mastered, the primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration can be safe and feasible. It can avoid the disadvantage of T-tube drainage of common bile duct and is worth being generalized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.141.195