机构地区:[1]山东省滕州市中心人民医院手术室,277500 [2]山东省滕州市中心人民医院妇科,277500 [3]山东省滕州市中心人民医院护理部,277500
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2014年第8期916-919,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨对妇科腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术患者实施团队合作舒适护理干预的效果。方法选取择期行子宫肌瘤切除术患者156例,按随机数字表法分为干预组78例和对照组78例。对照组患者遵医嘱实施妇科腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术常规护理配合,干预组患者在此基础上,建立腹腔镜手术团队合作舒适护理小组,实施术前互动式访视、术中舒适护理配合及术后回访为一体的舒适护理配合干预模式。比较两组干预效果。结果干预组患者手术时间为(52.63±7.25)min,术后呼之睁眼时间为(18.62±1.65)min,呼之握拳时间为(22.15±1.32)min,气管拔管时间为(25.37±1.52)min,均低于对照组的(58.72±7.31)min,(23.05±1.72)min,(25.67±1.38)min,(29.62±1.56)min,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t值分别为5.224,16.415,16.279,17.233;P〈0.01)。干预组术后12,24,48,72h的疼痛评分分别为(4.32±1.42),(3.29±1.27),(2.37±1.05),(1.25±1.02)分,明显低于对照组的(5.47±1.52),(4.56±1.31),(3.56±1.08),(1.82±1.05)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t值分别为4.883,6.147,6.977,3.439;P〈0.05)。干预组首次下床时间(12.35±3.17)h、术后24,48,72h睡眠时间[(5.72±2.31),(6.55±1.58),(7.87±1.25)h]、住院时间(7.13±1.28)d均优于对照组的(17.52±3.23)h,(3.59±2.35)h,(5.37±1.63)h,(6.58±1.27)h,(8.67±1.59)d,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t值分别为10.089,5.709,4.591,6.393,6.663;P〈0.01);干预组术后并发症发生率为6.41%,对照组为24.36%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^2=9.652,P〈0.05)。结论对妇科腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术患者实施舒适护理配合�Objective To investigate the effect of comfort nursing based on teamwork on patients after laparoscopic myomectomy of hysteromyoma. Methods One hundred and fifty-six patients who chose laparoscopic myomectomy of hysteromyoma were randomly divided in the intervention group and the control group, each with 78 cases. The control group received conventional nursing while the intervention group received comfort nursing including preoperative interactive supervision, intranperative comfort nursing and postoperative visits. Effect of nursing was compared between two groups. Results The operation time, called the eye opening after the operation, called the open fist time and the tracheal extubation time was respectively (52. 63 ± 7.25 ) min, ( 18. 62 ± 1.65) min, ( 22. 15 ± 1.32 ) min and ( 25.37 ± 1.52) min in the intervention group, shorter than (58.72 ± 7. 31 ) min, (23.05 ± 1.72 ) min, ( 25.67 ± 1.38 ) min and ( 29. 62 ± 1.56 ) min in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (t = 5. 224,16. 415,16. 279,17. 233, respectively; P 〈 0.01). The pain score 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after operation was respectively (4. 32 ± 1.42), (3.29 ± 1.27), (2. 37 ± 1.05), ( 1.25 ± 1.02)in the intervention group, lower than(5.47 ± 1.52), (4. 56 ± 1.31 ), (3.56 ± 1.08 ), ( 1.82 ± 1.05 ) in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant ( t = 4. 883,6. 147, 6. 977,3.439, respectively; P 〈 0. 05). The time of first being out of bed was (12. 35 ± 3.17 )'h in the intervention group and (17.52 ± 3.23 )h in the control group, with statistically significant difference (t = 10. 089,P 〈0. 05). Sleep time 24, 48 and 72 h after surgery as well as hospitalization time was respectively (5.72 ± 2. 31 ) h, (6. 55 ± 1.58) h, (7. 87 ± 1.25 ) h and (7. 13 ± 1.28 ) d in the intervention group, better than (17.52 ±3.23)h, (3.59 _±2.35)h,(5.37 ± 1.63)h, (6.58 ± 1.27�
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...