检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津市滨海新区塘沽中医医院,天津300451
出 处:《湖南中医杂志》2014年第3期18-19,22,共3页Hunan Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:天津市滨海新区塘沽科技兴区项目(编号:2007XQ16-13);天津市滨海新区卫生局科技项目(编号:2012BWKL003);天津市滨海新区塘沽科技发展专项(编号:2012MS05-05)
摘 要:目的:观察肠道水疗合云南白药、锡类散结肠灌注治疗溃疡性结肠炎的临床疗效。方法:随机将60例活动期轻度溃疡性结肠炎患者分为3组各20例,对照1组采用艾迪沙口服治疗,对照2组采用柳氮磺胺吡啶保留灌肠治疗,治疗组采用肠道水疗配合云南白药、锡类散结肠灌注治疗。结果:总有效率治疗组为70%,对照1组为55%,对照2组为50%。治疗组与对照1组和对照2组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:肠道水疗合云南白药、锡类散结肠灌注治疗活动期轻度溃疡性结肠炎的疗效优于艾迪沙口服及柳氮磺胺吡啶保留灌肠治疗。Objective :To observe the clinical efficacy of intestinal hydrotherapy plus colon peffusion with Yun- nan white medicinal powder and Xilei powder in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: Sixty patients with mild active UC were divided into first and second control groups (n = 20 for each) and treatment group (n = 20). The first control group received oral Etiasa,the second control group was given sulfasalazine retention enema, and the treatment group received intestinal hydrotherapy plus colon perfusion with Yunnan white medicinal powder and Xilei powder. Results:The treatment group had a significantly higher response rate than the first and second control groups (70% vs 55% and 50% ,P 〈 0.05). Conclusion:Intestinal hydrotherapy plus colon perfusion with Yummn white medicinal powder and Xilei powder has better clinical efl'icacy than oral Etiasa and retention enema with sulfasalazine in the treatment of mild active UC.
分 类 号:R259.746.2[医药卫生—中西医结合]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249