检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:聂柏松[1] 沈振中[2] 邱莉婷 任华春 王瑞[1] 张腾蛟
机构地区:[1]河海大学水利水电学院,江苏南京210098 [2]河海大学水资源高效利用与工程安全国家工程研究中心,江苏南京210098 [3]上海市水利工程设计研究院有限公司,上海200063
出 处:《水电能源科学》2014年第4期136-138,128,共4页Water Resources and Power
基 金:江苏省自然科学基金青年基金项目(SBK201240863)
摘 要:针对传统的强度折减法未考虑到边坡破坏过程中粘聚力和内摩擦角衰减速度的差异及边坡所有单元的强度参数均折减的问题,对边坡材料强度参数粘聚力和内摩擦角分别采用不同的折减系数,并根据屈服接近度判别标准,逐步调整折减区域,提出了边坡稳定分析的双安全系数动态局部强度折减法。实例应用结果表明,该方法能够较好地反映边坡破坏过程中粘聚力和内摩擦角衰减速度的差别,可模拟边坡失稳演变过程,得到的安全系数一般小于传统强度折减法和动态局部强度折减法。Strength reduction method is widely used in slope stability and safety analysis, but this method has limitations: first, the different decay rates of cohesion and frication are not considered in typical strength reduction method; meanwhile, this method reduces the shear strength parameters of all elements of the slope. Thus, double safety factors and dynamic local area strength reduction method were put forward to remedy the defects of traditional strength method. In the new method, different reduction factors for cohesion and frication were adopted, and reduction area were gradually changed according to yielding approach index. The practical results show that the proposed method perfectly reflected the different decay rates of cohesion and frication and stimulated progressive failure of slopes, the safety factor is smaller than that of traditional strength reduction and dynamic local area strength reduction method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.206.193