双向扬刺法治疗腱鞘囊肿临床观察  

Clinical observation on two-way quintuple puncture in the treatment of ganglion

作　　者：赵耀东[1] 韩豆瑛[2] 尹秦[3] 丁晓娟[3] 高娅妮[3] 周巧玲[3] 

机构地区：[1]甘肃中医学院针灸推拿系,兰州730000 [2]甘肃省康复中心医院 [3]甘肃中医学院附属医院

出　　处：《中国针灸》2014年第4期347-349,共3页Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion

摘　　要：目的:探寻治疗腱鞘囊肿的较佳疗法。方法:将90例腱鞘囊肿患者随机分为双向扬刺组、普通扬刺组和火针组,每组30例。双向扬刺组采用双向扬刺法"九尖合一"多点透刺治疗;普通扬刺组采用传统扬刺法"五尖合一"多点透刺治疗;火针组采用传统火针多点速刺治疗。3组均每日1次,3次为一疗程,治疗1个疗程后统计疗效。结果:3种方法对腱鞘囊肿均有疗效,双向扬刺组的治愈率为96.7%(29/30),明显优于普通扬刺组的66.7%(20/30)和火针组的60.0%(18/30,均P<0.01)。结论:双向扬刺法治疗腱鞘囊肿的临床疗效明显优于普通扬刺和火针治疗。Objective To explore the better therapy in the treatment of ganglion. Methods Ninety cases of ganglion were randomized into a two-way quintuple puncture group, a common quintuple puncture group and a fire needling group, 30 cases in each one. In the two-way quintuple puncture group, the ＂9-in-l＂ multiple penetrating needling technique was used. In the common quintuple puncture group, the traditional ＂5-in-1＂ multiple penetrat- ing needling technique was applied. In the fire needling group, the traditional multiple fire needling technique was adopted. The treatment was given once a day, 3 treatments made one session and the efficacy was analyzed statisti- cally after 1 session treatment in the three groups. Results All of the three therapeutic methods achieved the effi- cacy on ganglion. The curative rate was 96. 7% （29/30） in the two-way quintuple puncture group, which was better obviously than 66.70% （20/30） in the common quintuple puncture group and 60. 0% （18/30） in the fire needling group （both P〈0.01）. Conclusion The two-way quintuple puncture technique achieves the remarkably superior efficacy on ganglion as compared with the common quintuple puncture technique and fire needling tech- nique.

关 键 词：腱鞘囊肿 扬刺法 双向针刺 火针 

分 类 号：R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]