刍议累犯条款的司法适用——从未成年人的角度  

On Judicial Application of Recidivism Terms to Juveniles

作　　者：李晓郛 

机构地区：[1]福建省人民检察院,福州350013

出　　处：《唐山学院学报》2014年第2期46-49,共4页Journal of Tangshan University

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目(2011JZD009)

摘　　要：累犯条款历经数次修改,2011年《刑法修正案(八)》又加入了处理未成年人犯罪的内容。现在的学界通说以及司法实践都是以实施前罪时的年龄作为排除累犯的时间标准,认为这是符合"教育为主、惩罚为辅"的原则。但是由于97刑法第65条第1款已经存在语法和解释问题,并且从累犯设立的初衷、刑事政策、前科制度的设计以及最高人民法院"跨法适用"的惯常做法上看,97刑法第65条"不满18周岁的人犯罪"应当理解为行为人实施后罪时不满18周岁。Terms of recidivism have been modified several times,and in the 2011 Amendment of Criminal Law （eighth）some j uvenile delinquency content was added.In academic circles and j udi-cial practice,the age when the previous crime was committed is not regarded as recidivism time, which is consistent with the principle of “education first,punishment supplemented”.However, because there exists some grammatical and interpretative problems in Section 1 of Article 97 of Criminal Law,and in the perspective of the establishment of recidivism,criminal policies,crimi-nal record system and the practice of the Supreme court,the author insists that “A perpetrator under 1 8 years of age commit crime”should be understood as “the perpetrator is under 1 8 when the crime is carried out.”

关 键 词：累犯 未成年人 条款 司法适用 

分 类 号：D924.13[政治法律—刑法学]