马克思主义辩证法的一元性本质与多元化探索  

Marxist Dialectics: Its Unitary Essence and Multipolar Reorientations

作　　者：刘怀玉[1] 章慕荣[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学马克思主义社会理论研究中心,南京210093

出　　处：《南京大学学报（哲学．人文科学．社会科学）》2014年第2期5-15,157,共11页Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点基地重大项目(13JJD710002);国家社会科学基金项目(11BZX0005);南京大学人文社会科学高级研究院资助项目

摘　　要：马克思主义辩证法的百年发展历程一波三折,历经"单义"、"多义"之变,在当代西方则呈现为"弱义"的态势。"单义"是指辩证法的唯一性诉求,历史辩证法是马克思心中严格、绝对、唯一的辩证法,作为严格体系的辩证法与作为方法论的辩证法不可分割。"多义"是指辩证法在理论与实践的双重转换中所表现出来的未完成性和不确定性。在西方,辩证法的多样化发展以脱离历史唯物主义基本原则和政治经济学批判语境为代价,从而以各种微弱和坚守的方式存在于文化研究、社会理论研究以及社会抗议活动之中,使辩证法呈现出弱势的姿态。这既是辩证法在继强势一元性的辩证法体系与多元化的辩证法探索之后的潜伏与徘徊,也是辩证法在当代西方的现实策略。For the last century,Marxist dialectic has been through the twists and turns of the monosemantic and polysemantic though it turns not to be that prominent in today's western society. While the monosemantic makes clear what the Dialectic hopes to ultimately achieve as the most rigorous,absolute and unitary of the dialectics,and the inseparable part of the dialectics as a rigorous system and as a methodology,the polysemantic shows the imperfectness and uncertainty of the two-way operation between theory and practice. The multi-polar development of dialectics in the west is made possible at the sacrifice of the basic principles of historical materialism and the critique of political economy. Dialectics may thus present themselves,though not prominently,in cultural studies,social theory studies and social protests,as is a wandering period of latency for reemergence after experiencing a glory as a unitary system and the multipolar reorientations,and this is the realistic surviving strategy for dialectics in the west.

关 键 词：历史辩证法 恩格斯 列宁 《哲学笔记》 卢卡奇 社会批判理论 文化研究 

分 类 号：A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学] B024