国际法律文本中违约损害赔偿制度及其借鉴  

The System of Damages for Breach of Contract in International Legal Texts and Use for Reference

作　　者：莫万友[1] 

机构地区：[1]电子科技大学中山学院,广东中山528403

出　　处：《时代法学》2014年第2期103-108,共6页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划项目"国际法律文本中违约损害赔偿制度研究"(项目编号:GD12XFX01);电子科技大学中山学院科研团队培育研究项目(412YT03)成果之一

摘　　要：CISG、UPICC和PECL是国际贸易统一实体法的重要成果,对国际贸易产生了重大影响。在违约损害赔偿制度方面,三者作出详尽的规定,统一化程度较高,尽管在某种程度上还存在一些差异。我国《合同法》对违约损害赔偿制度作出了具体规定,这些规定在实务中发挥了重要作用,但是这些具体规定在某种程度上还存在缺陷,需要进一步完善。CISG、UPICC和PECL中有关违约损害赔偿制度的合理规定,对完善我国《合同法》中违约损害赔偿制度具有一定的借鉴意义。CISG, UPICC and PECL, tive law in international trade, have had a which are important achievement of the uniform substansignificant impact on international trade. As for the system of damages for breach of contract, they all made detailed provisions, among which unified degree is high, although there are still some differences. China＇s ＂contract law＂ made specific provisions for the system of damages for breach of contract, which play an important role in practice, but the specific provisions have some flaw in some extent, and need be improved further. The reasonable provisions about damages for breach of contract in CISG, UPICC and PECL have a certain reference significance to improve China＇s ＂contract law＂

关 键 词：国际法律文本 违约损害赔偿 《合同法》 

分 类 号：D923.9[政治法律—民商法学]