杀虫剂类持久性有机污染物废物处置技术评价研究  

Assessment of pesticide POPs waste disposal technologies

作　　者：李扬[1,2] 王琪[1,2] 黄启飞[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学水科学研究院,北京100875 [2]中国环境科学研究院固体废物污染控制技术研究所,北京100012

出　　处：《环境污染与防治》2014年第4期43-48,64,共7页Environmental Pollution & Control

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51178439);环境保护部公益项目(No.201009026)

摘　　要：联用专家评估和层次分析法,对水泥窑共处置、危险废物焚烧两项杀虫剂类持久性有机污染物(POPs)焚烧处置技术和包括碱金属还原、气相化学还原、碱性催化分解、超临界水氧化、等离子体电弧、熔盐氧化、溶解电子、球磨、玻璃固化、加氢脱氯催化在内的10项非焚烧处置技术进行评价。结果表明:以水泥窑共处置技术为代表的焚烧技术,由于其较好的稳定性、可行性和广谱性,在整体评价上优于非焚烧处置技术;在非焚烧技术的应用上,应优先发展碱金属还原、超临界水氧化、碱性催化分解和等离子体电弧技术,从而提高应对复杂情况下处理杀虫剂类POPs的能力。The disposal technologies for treating obsolete POPs pesticides,including 2 incineration technologies, namely cement kiln co-processing,hazardous waste incineration, and 10 non-incineration technologies,ineluding alkali metal reduction,gas-phase chemical reducion, base catalyzed decomposition, supercritical water oxidation, plasma arc, molten salt oxidation,solvated electron technology,ball milling,glass solidification and catalytic hydro-deehlorination, were assessed in this paper by the methods of expert evaluation and analytic hierarchy process. The results showed that the incineration technologies, especially the cement kiln co-processing, performed better than non-incineration technologies on overall evaluation due to their better stability, feasibility and broad-spectrum for treating obsolete POPs pesticides. While on the aspect of application of non-incineration technologies,alkali metal reduction,supercriti cal water oxidation, base catalyzed decomposition, and plasma are should be given priority to improve the ability of coping with treating POPs waste in complex situations：

关 键 词：杀虫剂 持久性有机污染物 处置技术 层次分析 

分 类 号：X505[环境科学与工程—环境工程]