检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李健[1] 郑敏莉[2] 黄裕清[1] 冯凌松[1] 黄敏志[1] 邹火生[1]
机构地区:[1]梅州市人民医院泌尿外二科,广东梅州514031 [2]嘉应学院医学院
出 处:《岭南现代临床外科》2014年第2期182-185,共4页Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨经尿道前列腺双极等离子电切术(bipolar transurethral plasma kinetic resection of the prostate,TUPKP)治疗高危前列腺增生症(Benign prostatic hyperplasia,BPH)的安全性与有效性。方法回顾性分析经尿道前列腺双极等离子电切术治疗的高危BPH患者的临床资料97例,其中前列腺剜除51例、传统电切46例。结果手术时间为(51.3±22.1)min,术中出血平均(62.4±16.2)mL,切除的前列腺标本重量为(66.3±18.5)g,术后冲洗时间为(36.1±10.3)h,拔管时间为(5.0±1.5)d。国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)由术前的(26.6±4.5)分降至(6.8±3.5)分,生活质量评分由术前的(4.9±1.3)分降至(1.8±0.6)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论经尿道等离子电切术治疗高危前列腺增生是一种安全、有效的手术方式,但需根据患者具体情况个体化选择行剜除术或行传统电切术。ObjectiveTo assess the clinical efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral plasma kinetic resection of the prostate (TUPKP) for treatment of high risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MethodsThe clinical data of 97 symptomatic BPH patients who underwent transurethral enucleate resection of prostate (TUERP) and TUPKP were retrospectively analyzed. 51 cases and 46 cases were performed by the methods of TUERP and TUPKP respectively. ResultsThe mean operation time was (51.3±22.1) min. The volume of blood loss was (62.4±16.2) mL. The mean weight of resected prostate glands was (66.3±18.5) g. The washing time after operation was (36.1±10.3) h; and the extubating time was (5.0±1.5) d. The international prostate symptom score (IPSS) decreased from 26.6±4.5 to 6.8±3.5.Quality of life decreased from 5.9±1.3 to 1.8±0.6, and all the differences were significant (P〈0.01). ConclusionTUPKP were effective and safe to deal with the patients with BPH in high risk, but proper individual operation method (TUERP or TUPKP) should depend on the specific circumstances of the patients.
关 键 词:高危前列腺增生 经尿道双极等离子前列腺切除术
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166