检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《液压与气动》2014年第3期31-34,共4页Chinese Hydraulics & Pneumatics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51305305);浙江省自然科学基金项目(LQ13E050010);浙江省教育厅科研项目(Y201120787)
摘 要:针对提出的一种电液伺服阀用耐高压双向线性力马达,建立了基于瞬态电磁场理论的数学模型,通过有限元仿真分析了其力阶跃响应特性,并结合实验研究,对电压源和电流源两种驱动方式下的阶跃响应特性及成因进行对比分析。实验与仿真结果趋势基本一致,表明在电压源驱动方式下,电流和力阶跃响应时间分别为86 ms和108 ms;而在电流源驱动方式下,响应时间明显减小,电流和力阶跃响应时间分别为17 ms和33 ms。A bi-directional linear force motor for the electro-hydraulic servo valve was proposed, and a mathemati- cal model based on the theory of transient electromagnetic field was established. The force step response character- istics of the linear force motor were analyzed by the finite element method simulation. In combination with experi- ments, the step response characteristics of voltage and current sources were compared, and the reason was dis- cussed. The simulation results agree with that of experiment. The current and force step response time are respec- tively 86 ms and 108 ms when the motor is driven by the voltage source, but respectively 17 ms and 33 ms when driven by the current source.
分 类 号:TH137.52[机械工程—机械制造及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222