插管型喉罩LMA-Fastrach与I-gel引导盲探气管插管的比较  

Comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask Fastrach versus the I-gel laryngeal mask for blind intubation

作　　者：王勇[1] 马武华[1] 蔡诚毅[1] 代文杰[1] 钟鸣[1] 黎峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州中医药大学第一附属医院麻醉科,510405

出　　处：《临床麻醉学杂志》2014年第4期336-338,共3页Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology

基　　金：广东省科技厅社会发展项目(2011B031800029)

摘　　要：目的比较插管型喉罩LMA-Fastrach和I-gel喉罩引导盲探气管插管的临床效果。方法择期全麻手术患者60例,随机分为两组,分别采用LMA-Fastrach(L组)和I-gel(I组)行盲探气管插管。记录喉罩和气管导管插入时间、盲探插管总时间,及喉罩和气管导管尝试插入次数。结果I组喉罩插入时间[(20±3)s vs.(27±5)s]、盲探插管总时间[(85±4)s vs.(95±6)s]明显短于L组(P<0.05)。两组气管导管插入时间以及喉罩、气管导管插入次数差异无统计学意义。结论LMA-Fastrach和I-gel喉罩均可用于引导盲探气管插管。Objective To compare the effectiveness of intubating laryngeal mask Fastrach （LMA-Fastrach） and I-gel laryngeal mask during blind intubation. Methods Sixty patients scheduled for elective general anesthesia requiring tracheal intubation were randomly allocated to receive LMA- Fastrach（group L） or I-gel（group I）, respectively. Time for LMA intubation was evaluated, as well as time for tracheal intubation, total time of blind intubation, attempts of laryngeal intubation, and attempts of tracheal intubation, were also recorded. Results The time for LMA intubation [ （20± 3）s vs. （27±5） s] and total time of blind intubation [（85±4） s vs. （95±6） s] in group I were shorter than group L（P〈0.05）. There were no difference in time for tracheal intubation, attempts of laryngeal intubation and attempts of tracheal intubation. Conclusion Both LMA Fastrach and I-gel mask were equally effective for blind tracheal intubation.

关 键 词：Fastrach喉罩 I-gel喉罩 

分 类 号：R614[医药卫生—麻醉学]