检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军第175医院(厦门大学附属东南医院)急诊科,福建漳州363000
出 处:《临床急诊杂志》2014年第3期159-161,共3页Journal of Clinical Emergency
摘 要:目的:探讨急诊绿色通道在抢救腹部外伤并发休克患者中的体会。方法:回顾分析了急诊绿色通道建立近4年来220例创伤患者急救情况,以过去4年急救的100例腹部外伤并发失血性休克患者作为常规组。结果:两组基线资料具有可比性,绿色通道组120例患者死亡6例,病死率5%,常规组100例患者死亡20例,死亡率20%(P<0.05)。绿色通道组在抢救室抢救时间、特殊检查时间、入院至手术室时间较常规组明显缩短(P<0.05)。结论:急诊绿色通道的建立和完善,缩短了患者的救治空间和时间,显著降低伤死率,提高了救治成功率。Objective:The experience of emergency easy access in the treatment of abdominal trauma combined with shock patients. Method:Retrospective analysis of the treatment of 220 trauma patients in recent 4 years after the establishment of the emergency easy access. 100 cases of abdominal trauma patients combined with hemorrhagic shock were selected as controls. Result:The baseline data of the two groups of were comparable. There were 6 ca- ses of deaths in 120 patients of the emergency easy access group and the mortality rate was 5%. There were 20 ca- ses of deaths in the control group with the mortality was 20% (P〈0. 05). The rescue time in the emergency room, the special examination time, and the time from hospitalization to operation reduced significantly than that in the conventional group(P〈0.05). Conclusion: Establishment and improvement of the emergency easy access can shorten the treatment of patients, reduce the dead rate and improve the success rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117