合议庭中评议决策的偏好逻辑分析  

Analysis on Preference Logic of Appraisal Decision-making in Collegial Panel

作　　者：贺寿南[1] 

机构地区：[1]衡阳师范学院人文社科系,湖南衡阳421002

出　　处：《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》2014年第3期22-25,57,共5页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）

基　　金：教育部人文社科项目"司法裁判中法官理性实现的逻辑分析"(10YJCZH039);湘潭大学诉讼法学研究中心开放课题"民事裁判的博弈分析"(12fx005)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：合议庭的评议是审判运行机制中的最核心部分,其合理运作直接决定着审判制度功能的发挥。构建一个科学、合理的评议程序是实现司法裁判结果公正、合理的有效保障。我国有关评议制度的法律规定本身并不健全,合议庭评议规则存在漏洞。合议庭可将各法官对某案件态度的偏好汇集成群体偏好,然后做出优劣排序或从中选优而形成一个总的裁判决策。The deliberation of collegiate bench is the central part of the trial operation mechanism, which will directly determine the operation of the judicial system. Constructing a scientific and reason- able evaluation program is the effective safeguard that realizes fair and reasonable judicial referee re-suits. The law on deliberation system in China itself is not sound, because there are loopholes in eval-uation rules. The collegiate bench condenses all individuals＇ preferences of judges into group prefer-ence and arranges in order or select the best scheme by comparison to form a general juridical deci-sion.

关 键 词：合议庭 评议决策 偏好逻辑 

分 类 号：D90-051[政治法律—法学理论] D915[政治法律—法学]