检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《浙江临床医学》2014年第4期542-543,共2页Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
摘 要:目的比较药物、剖腹手术、腹腔镜手术三种治疗方法对异位妊娠的疗效。方法210例异位妊娠患者分为腔镜组、剖腹组、药物组,各70例,比较输卵管通畅率、异位妊娠复发率、宫内妊娠成功率。结果腔镜组输卵管通畅率高于其它二组(P〈0.05),药物组异位妊娠复发率低于其他二组(P〈0.05),三组间宫内妊娠成功率差异无统计学意义。结论腹腔镜手术是一种治疗异位妊娠安全有效的方法,优于剖腹手术。严格把握适应证,药物治疗可部分替代手术治疗。Objective To compare the effect of drugs, laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery treatments for ectopic pregnancy. Mehods 210 cases of ectopic pregnancy were divided into three groups, laparoscopy group, laparotomy group and drug group. The tubal patency rate, ectopic pregnancy rate of recurrence, and the intrauterine pregnancy success rate were investegated between three groups. Result The tubal patency rate of laparoscopic surgery group was significantly higher than the conservative treatment group and the open surgery group. The pregnancy relapse rate of conservative treatment group is lower than the other two groups, There is no difference in the intrauterine pregnancy success rate among the three groups. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery is a safe and effective method for ectopic pregnancy, better than the laparotomy method, if the surgical treatment indications are strictly controled, drug therapy can be a partial substitute.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13