Airtraq喉镜与Lightwand光棒行气管插管的应用  被引量:1

Application of Airtraq laryngoscope and Lightwand in tracheal intubation

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:蒋鹏[1] 王新荣[2] 马鹏 华佳[1] 阚明秀[1] 

机构地区:[1]江苏大学附属医院麻醉科,212001 [2]新疆生产建设兵团四师医院麻醉科

出  处:《江苏医药》2014年第7期789-791,共3页Jiangsu Medical Journal

摘  要:目的探讨Airtraq喉镜与Lightwand光棒在气管插管中的应用效果。方法全麻患者48例,术前改良Mallampati气道评估分级Ⅰ-Ⅱ级,随机均分为Airtraq喉镜组(A组)和Lightwand光棒组(L组),记录两组患者插管前后平均动脉压和心率的变化、一次插管成功率、插管时间及插管后并发症发生情况。结果一次插管成功率A组100%,L组95.8%;L组插管时间短于A组[(23.7±6.1)s vs.(33.0±3.2)s](P<0.05)。插管前后血流动力学变化两组间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。L组术后2例出现吞咽疼痛。结论 Airtraq喉镜和Lightwand光棒插管过程中血流动力学稳定。Airtraq喉镜能提供更好的插管条件。Objective To investigate the clinical application of Airtraq laryngoscope and Lightwand in tracheal intubation. Methods Forty-eight patients (modified Mallampati grade Ⅰ -Ⅱ ) scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia were equally randomized into group A (tracheal intubation with Airtraq laryngoscope) and L(with Lightwand). The changes of MAP and HR before and after tracheal intubation were measured. The success rate of intubation at first-attempt, intubation time and intubation-related complications were recorde& Results The success rate of intubation at first-attempt was 100% in group A and 95.8% in group L. The intubation time in group L was shorter than that in group A [(23.7±6.1) s vs. (33. 0±3.2) s](P〈0. 05). There were no significant differences in hemodynamic changes between two groups during intubation(P〈0. 05). Two cases in group L occurred painful swallowing after surgery. Conclusion The hemodynamics is stable during tracheal intubation with Airtraq laryngoscope and Lightwand. Airtraq laryngoscope can provide better conditions for intubation.

关 键 词:AIRTRAQ喉镜 Lightwand光棒 气管插管 

分 类 号:R614[医药卫生—麻醉学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象