检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2014年第9期1062-1064,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨心理护理对肝脏MRI动态增强扫描检查不良反应及图像质量的影响。方法选取2012年6月—2013年7月在某院磁共振室行肝脏MR/动态增强扫描检查的420例患者,按照随机数字表法将420例患者分为观察组和对照组,每组各210例。对照组患者给予肝脏MR/动态增强扫描常规护理,观察组患者在常规护理的基础上给予全程心理护理干预;观察并比较两组患者检查中屏气不当、图像伪影及不良反应发生率。结果观察组患者屏气不当、图像伪影发生率均为2.73%,明显低于对照组的24.55%,24.09%,差异有统计学意义(x2分别为4.53,4.45;P〈0.05);观察组患者不良反应发生率为4.55%,明显低于对照组的25.9l%,差异有统计学意义(x2=4.33,P〈0.05)。结论给予肝脏MR/动态增强扫描患者心理护理干预可为获得清晰图像质量,降低不良反应,提高临床诊断率提供帮助。Objective To explore the effect of psychological nursing on adverse reaction and image quality of the contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of liver. Methods Four hundred and twenty patients with the contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of liver from June 2012 to July 2013 were chosen and divided into the observation group and the control group according to random number table, each with 210 cases. The control group received the routine nursing, and the observation group received the psychological nursing intervention on the basis of conventional nursing. The incidence rates of improper breath holding, image artifact and adverse reaction were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence rates of improperbreath holding, image artifact and adverse reaction in the observation group were respectively 2.73%, 2.73%, 4.55%, and were significantly lower than 24.55% ,24.09% and 25.91% in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant ( X2 = 4.53, 4.45, 4.33, respectively ; P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions The psychological nursing intervention in the patients with the contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of liver can help to obtain high quality of image, reduce adverse reaction, and improve the clinical diagnosis rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28