检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《浙江大学学报(工学版)》2014年第3期487-491,560,共6页Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(50908208)
摘 要:为了准确描述开孔结构内压脉动响应过程,将不同内压脉动预测公式进行比较,对不同开孔尺寸和内部容积模型进行风洞试验,研究了湍流度、来流风速和开孔位置对开孔结构内压脉动响应的影响,并探讨不同预测公式的适用性.研究结果表明:开孔迎风时内压脉动较大,而斜风向下内外压脉动均方根比达到最大;孔口处湍流强度对内压脉动影响显著,而风速对内压均方根影响并不显著;迎风墙面中心开孔相比偏心开孔具有更大的内压均值和均方根.In order to accurately describe the internal pressure fluctuation in an opening structure,different empirical expressions for prediction of internal pressure were reviewed and compared.Wind tunnel tests were applied to models with different opening sizes and internal volumes to investigate the influence factors of fluctuating internal pressure including:turbulence intensity,wind velocity in approaching flow as well as opening location,and the applicability of different prediction equations were also discussed.The results show that the windward opening under normal onset flow can cause strong fluctuating internal pressure, while the maxima root mean square(RMS)ratio of internal to external pressure appears at oblique wind angle.Turbulence intensity at opening location has significant impact on the fluctuation of internal pressure.However,the effect of wind velocity on the RMS of internal pressure is insignificant.Central opening in windward wall results in bigger average and RMS values of internal pressure than those off-center wall openings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7