检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:庞建红 汪小华[2] 刘永琴 鞠阳[4] 许义[4]
机构地区:[1]江苏盛泽医院护理部,苏州215228 [2]苏州大学附属第一医院肾内科 [3]苏州市吴江区第一人民医院 [4]苏州大学护理学院
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2014年第12期10-15,共6页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基 金:基金项目:苏州市科技计划项目(SYS201310)
摘 要:目的评价护理干预对持续非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者生活质量的影响。方法计算机检索Cochrane、PubMed、Elsevier Science Direct、VIP、CNKI、万方数据库并辅以互联网络检索。收集对CAPD患者进行护理干预的随机对照试验(RCT),采用RevMan5.1软件进行统计处理。结果共纳入RCT文献8篇。Meta分析结果显示,本组资料存在一定的异质性,其中干预时间和年龄是导致异质性的主要原因,以性别分组进行亚组分析显示异质性未能明显消除。干预组患者在情感职能维度得分高于对照组;在躯体疼痛和心理健康维度得分明显高于对照组;在生理功能、生理职能、总体健康、生命活力和社会功能维度得分显著高于对照组。结论护理干预可以提高CAPD患者的生活质量。Objective To evaluate the effect of nursing interventions on the quality of life of patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving nursing interventions were collected from the databases of Cochrane, PubMed, Elsevier Science Direct, VIP, CNKI and WanFang. Data were analyzed with RevMan 5.1 software. Results 8 articles met the inclusion criteria. The results of Meta-analysis showed that there was considerable heterogeneity across the analysis, which might be resulted from length of intervention and patients of different ages according to subgroup analysis, and that gender was not the factor causing heterogeneity. In the experimental group, both physical and emotional aspects after receiving nursing interventions were significantly improved than the control group. Conclusions Nursing interventions can improve the quality of life of patients with CAPD.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249