效率增进与技术进步对绿色生产率增长的影响——来自中国36个两位数工业行业的实证  

The Effect of Efficiency Improvement and Technological Progress on Green Productivity Growth: An Empirical Analysis for 36 Sub-industrial Sectors in China

作　　者：周五七 

机构地区：[1]江南大学商学院,江苏无锡214122

出　　处：《统计与信息论坛》2014年第4期63-69,共7页Journal of Statistics and Information

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目<碳排放约束下长三角经济转型轨迹及其区域联动效果研究>(12YJAZH160);江南大学自主科研计划;中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目<基于地区结构的中国低碳经济转型绩效评估>(ZUSRP11467)

摘　　要：利用全局DEA及Malmquist-Luenberger指数,测度1998—2010年中国工业行业绿色TFP及其分解成份,结果发现:工业绿色TFP增长的动力主要来自技术进步,技术效率整体上拖累了工业绿色TFP增长;工业碳生产率不断提升,技术效率对工业碳生产率增长的促进作用强于技术进步的促进作用,且重工业的技术效率与技术进步对碳生产率增长的促进效应高于轻工业。因此,除了发挥技术进步对工业行业碳生产率增长的促进作用外,更需要重视提升技术效率对工业行业碳生产率增长的推动作用。Global DEA approach and Malmquist-Luenberger index are applied to measure subindustrial green TFP growth and its components in presence of energy and carbon emissions. From the result of calculating, it is concluded that industrial green TFP growth is mainly driven by technological progress and drawn back by efficiency change. It is also found that the sub-industrial carbon productivity shows a constantly rising trend. The different impact of technical efficiency and technological progress is confirmed by empirical test on the rising sub-industrial carbon productivity. The impact of efficiency change is stronger than that of technological progress on industrial carbon productivity and the impact of technical efficiency and technological progress on the carbon productivity of weight industry is stronger than that of light industry. Therefore, Low-carbon technological progress should be strengthened to promote the sub- industrial carbon productivity growth, while more attention should be paid to exert the role of technical efficiency in promoting sub-industrial carbon productivity.

关 键 词：全局DEA Malmquist-Luenberger指数 技术效率 技术进步 碳生产率 

分 类 号：F224.3[经济管理—国民经济]