论裁判理由的独立价值——中国法治实践学派的一个研究角度  

On the Independent Value of Juridical Reasons:A View of Research for the Practical School of the Rule of Law

作　　者：范凯文[1] 钱弘道[2] 

机构地区：[1]太原理工大学政法学院 [2]浙江大学光华法学院

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2014年第4期64-72,157,共9页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：浙江省高级人民法院委托课题;浙江吴兴区人民法院委托课题;国家社科基金重点项目(编号:13AFX012)"司法透明指数研究"的阶段性成果

摘　　要：目前格式化的中国司法裁判文书普遍缺少理由提供,这与法治评估实践将其作为司法公开或透明的重要指标存在张力。缺乏裁判理由的裁判文书难以实现完整意义上的司法透明,进而影响着人们对裁判结论的接受性,最终决定着司法正义效果的实现。本文通过分析国内、外裁判文书中理由提供的实践,阐明裁判理由在裁判文书中的独立价值,为司法公开或透明的法治评估提供重要根据,也为倡导"实践、实证和实效"的中国法治实践学派构建打下基础。Judgment documents are often taken as an important index for judicial publicity or transparency in the evaluation practice of the rule of law. However,nowadays judgment documents generally lack of reason giving,and present the state of formatting,which objectively subtract the functions and meanings of the evaluation on the rule of law in China. So,the ' practical,positive and effective' evaluation on the rule of law which is proposed by the practical school of the rule of law will be built on stilts. This paper analyzes the practice of reason giving in judgment documents at home or abroad to clarify that the judicial reason is the important basis for the evaluation of the rule of law aiming at judicial transparency or publicity,and also the basis of establishment of the practical school of the rule of law,with independent value. Because it not only provides a basis for the evaluation of the rule of law,but also increases the acceptability for the judicial decision,it plays an important role in the realization of the justice results of law.

关 键 词：司法透明 理由提供 独立价值 中国法治实践学派 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]